The Efficacy of Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells in regenerating
Submandibular Gland Defects in Diabetic Wistar Rats (Rattus novergicus)
Septiana P. Suciadi1,
Alexander P. Nugraha2,3,4, Diah S. Ernawati5, Nurina
F. Ayuningtyas5, Ida B. Narmada2, Chiquita
Prahasanti6, Aristika Dinaryanti4, Igo Syaiful Ihsan4,
Eryk Hendrinto4, Helen Susilowati4, Fedik Abdul Rantam4,7
1Faculty of
Dentistry, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.
2Orthodontics
Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya,
Indonesia.
3Doctoral Student of
Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya,
Indonesia.
4Stem Cell Research
and Development Center, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya – Indonesia.
5Oral Medicine
Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya –
Indonesia.
6Periodontics
Department, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya –
Indonesia.
7Virology and
Immunology Laboratory, Microbiology Department, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,
Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya – Indonesia.
*Corresponding
Author E-mail: diah-s-e@fkg.unair.ac.id
ABSTRACT:
Chronic hyperglicemia in
Diabetes Mellitus caused microangiopathy in salivary gland. Human Dental Pulp
Stem Cells (HDPSCs) suspected can regenerate the defect. The aim of this study
was to analyze the efficacy of HDPSCs in stimulating angiogenesis, acinar cell
numbers and Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β) serum to regenerate
submandibular gland defects in diabetic Wistar rats. Twenty-four male Wistar
(250-350 g) rats 3-months-old were used. Rats were divided into 4 groups (n=6
each: a positive control group on Day 7 (DM) (C+7), a positive control group on
Day 14 (DM) (C+14), a treatment group on Day 7 (DM+5.105 HDPSCs
transplantation intraglandular) (T7) and a treatment group on Day 14 (DM+5.105
HDPSCs transplantation intraglandular) (T14). Wistar Rats were administered
with 30 mg of Streptozotocin per kg of bodyweight to induce Diabetes Mellitus
(DM). Histopathological examination with HE staining was performed to analyse
neovascularization and acinar cell numbers. ELISA was performed to measure
TGF-β serum. Statistical analysis used: A Tukey HSD or Bonferroni
test after ANOVA or Kruskal Wallis test was performed (p<0.05) based on a
Saphiro Wilk and Levene’s test (p>0.05). The highest acinar cell number was
found in the T7 group [513.167±136.17] with no significant difference [p=0.136,
p<0.05]. The highest capillaries were found in T14 [10.667±4.54] and
TGF-β serum level [168.87±37.38] with significant difference [p=0.006;
p<0.05] and [p=0.008, p<0.05]. HDPSCs can regenerate submandibular gland
defects in Diabetic Wistar rats by stimulating angiogenesis, acinar cells
number and TGF – β serum.
KEYWORDS: Human Dental Pulp
Stem Cells, Submandibular Gland Defect, Diabetes Mellitus, Acinar Cells,
Angiogenesis, Transforming Growth Factor-β.
INTRODUCTION:
Mesenchymal Stem Cells (MSCs)
are progenitor cells that can differentiate into mesodermal, endodermal or
ectodermal derivatives, rendering them suitable for use in tissue engineering.
Factors such as multipotent ability, the presence of immunomodulators and the
capacity to migrate directly to the tissue can initiate tissue regeneration
through angiogenesis. Thus, in turn, can enhance neovascularization which
improves the microangiopathic conditions that occur due to DM, especially in
the salivary glands.16-18 MSCs can be recruited and mobilized to
inflammation sites, as well as those resulting from injury, where they can be
incorporated into the microenvironment of ischemic tissue. Angiogenic factors
produced by MSCs include Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF),
Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGF-β), Placental Derived Growth Factor
(PGF), angiopoietin-1, Interleukin-6 and Monocyte Chemotactic Protein-1 (MCP-1)
which facilitate tissue regeneration.14
One example of MSCs that can
be used is the Human Dental Pulp Stem Cell (HDPSCs) which has cell
differentiation and renewal capabilities. It is enabling them to regenerate
acinar cells damaged by DM through various methods. HDPSC has similar
capabilities with bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell, but not invasive. However,
research into the use of stem cells originating from the oral cavity remains
limited and rarely applied even though it has encouraging potential for tissue
regeneration. Consequently, further research needs to be undertaken.18
The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of HDPSCs in
stimulating angiogenesis, acinar cell numbers and TGF-β serum to
regenerate submandibular gland defects in diabetic Wistar rats.
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Study design:
24-male wistar rat, 3-month
old, healthy, weighing 250-300 grams were used. All experimental procedures
were conducted with the approval of the local ethics committee
(047/HRECC.FODM/V/2018), having received a Home Office license. A healthy rat
is characterized by shiny fur, glowing eyes and agile movements. All
experimental subjects were maintained in a laboratory environment at 30% to 60%
humidity and temperatures ranging from 22±20C while being subject to
12-hour dark/light cycles.19 Sample size was determined using
Lemeshow’s formula and selected through a simple random sampling method. The
animal models were divided into four groups (n = 6: a positive control group on
Day 7 (DM) (C + 7), a positive control group on Day 14 (DM) (C + 14), a
treatment group on Day 7 (DM + 5.105 HDPSCs transplantation
intraglandular) (T7) and a treatment group on Day 14 (DM + 5.105 HDPSCs
transplantation intraglandular) (T14).
Induction of Diabetes
Mellitus:
The subjects were obliged to
fast for approximately 12 hours before induction to empty the stomach and
accelerate the occurrence of DM conditions. Diabetic rat subject creation was
achieved by STZ (bioWORLD, US) at a dose of 30 mg/kg which was dissolved in 30
mg/ml (pH 4.5) of citrate buffer (CV. Gamma Scientific Biolab, Malang,
Indonesia) injected intraperitoneally in the area adjacent to the midline
between two nipples or in the right/left umbilication. Induction was performed
once with the rat being held and the part to be injected rubbed with 70%
alcohol. The needle was inserted perpendicular from the right/left umbilical to
the peritoneal cavity and the contents injected slowly. Subjects were given 10%
sucrose solution or 10% dextrose (Otsuka, Indonesia) during the first night
after induction to avoid sudden hypoglycemia.20 Subjects were
declared diabetic on Day 7 after induction if their blood sugar levels were
measured at ≥200 mg / dl using Accu check (0197, EasyTouch GCU, Taiwan).21,22
Isolation and culture of Human
Dental Pulp Stem Cell:
HDPSC was isolated from the
premolar dental pulp of patients undergoing orthodontic therapy. The extracted
teeth were immediately immersed in Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM)
(D5796, Sigma Aldrich, US) and forwarded to the laboratory. The tooth was
washed with Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS) solution, cut in half and the pulp
tissue removed. The pulp tissue was digested in a solution of 3 mg/ml
collagenase type 1 (C9891, Sigma Aldrich, US) and 4 mg/ml dispase (D4818, Sigma
Aldrich, US) for 30-60 minutes at 370C. HDPSC was obtained by
filtering the digested tissue with 70μm cell filter. 1 cell suspension (1
x 105 cells / flask) was planted in α -Minimum Essential Medium
(α-MEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 2 mM L -
glutamine, 100 μM L-asorbic acid-2-phosphate, 100 U / mL penicillin - G,
100μg / mL streptomycin and 0.25μg / mL fungizone (A9528, Sigma
Aldrich, US). Cells were conditioned at a temperature of 370C in 5%
CO2 medium which was replaced every 2-3 days. The cell culture was passaged
three times to obtain the desired number of cells.23,24
Characterization of Human Pulp
Stem Cell:
HDPSC in the third passages
was then examined for cluster differentiation markers to confirm the presence
positive MSC markers, namely: CD73, CD90, CD105 and negative CD45 markers.
Cells were coated with coverslips and, after incubation at 370C for
1-2 hours, fixation was performed with 10% formaldehyde (F8775, Sigma Aldrich,
US) for 15 minutes and the coverslips were rinsed four times. Monoclonal
antibodies were labelled FITC (Santa Cruz Biotechnology TM, Dallas, Texas,
United State) CD105 (anti CD 105 sc-71042) positive, CD73 (anti CD73 sc-18849)
and CD90 (anti CD90 sc-53116) positive and CD45 (anti CD45 sc-53665) negative.25
Monoclonal antibodies were applied to cells and incubated for 60 minutes before
being rinsed twice with PBS and the cells were analysed in five different
visual fields observed by 2 persons (EH, APN) using an Olympus FSX100TM
fluorescence microscope (Center Valley, PA).
Human Pulp Stem Cell In vivo
Injection:
After a month injection of
STZ, subjects in the treatment group were injected with a single 5.105
cells/250-gram BW dose of HDPSC in 0.2 ml intraglandular PBS solution in the
submandibular gland. The control group subjects were injected with 0.2 ml of
PBS in the submandibular gland. The subjects were sacrificed on Day 7 and Day
14 using rodent anaesthesia (Ketamine 70 mg/kg BW and xylazine 5 ml). The
sub-mandibular gland and blood tissue were extracted for further analysis.20
Staining and Interpretation of
Hematoxylin and Eosin:
Staining was performed with
Mayer's Hematoxylin (MHS1, Sigma Aldrich, US) for 15 minutes followed by
rinsing with running water for five minutes or less until the samples appeared
blue. The results featured a nucleus with blue/black stain and cytoplasm with
pink stain. The examination was carried out by two observers (JL and SPS.) in
five different visual fields using a Nikon H600L light microscope (Japan) at
1000x magnification with a 300megapixel Fi2 DS digital camera and Nikon Image
System image processing software. Angiogenesis was observed from the number of
capillaries (cavities containing erythrocytes and surrounded by red endothelial
cells). Acinar cell formation constitutes a central cell nucleus found in the
eosinophilic cytoplasm.
Detection of TGF-β ELISA:
TGF-β ELISA (Bioassay Technology
Laboratory, Cat. No E0108Ra) is an enzyme immunoassay for the quantitative
determination of TGF-β in human serum, animal serum and cell culture supernatant. During
pre-testing of the standards, all samples were diluted in assay buffer,
acidified with HCl and subsequently neutralized with Neutralization Buffer.
Thereafter, the neutralized standards and samples were added to the antibody-coated
(polyclonal) microtiter wells. After incubation, unbonded sample material was
removed by washing. In a second step, monoclonal mouse anti TGF-β antibody, a
biotinylated anti mouse IgG antibody and the Streptavidin-HRP (Horseradish
Peroxidase) Enzyme complex were successively incubated, forming an immune
enzyme sandwich complex. After incubation, the unbonded conjugate was washed
off. Having added the substrate solution, the intensity of colour developed was
proportional to the concentration of TGF-β in the sample.27
Statistical analysis:
Angiogenesis and acinar cell
numbers were analysed statistically using multiple comparisons: a Tukey HSD
test (p<0.05) after ANOVA (p<0.05) analysis based on a Saphiro - Wilk and
a Levene’s test result (p>0.05), TGF-β were analysed statistically
using multiple comparisons of a Bonferroni test (p<0.05) after a Kruskal
Wallis test (p<0.05) had been performed, with Statistical Package for the
Social Sciences Software (SPSS) 20.0 edition (SPSS™, Chicago, United States).
HDPSC was passaged three times
to obtain the desired cell numbers (see Figure 1). It was transplanted 500.000
cells in each rat and calculated by cell counting software tools. In the third
passage, HDPSC expressed positive MSCs markers CD73 (+), CD90 (+), CD105 (+),
while it did not express HDPSCs marker CD45 (-) (see Figure 2). The acinar cell
constituted a central cell nucleus found in the eosinophilic cytoplasm. The
neovascularization was observed as capillaries (cavities containing
erythrocytes) (see Figure 3). Capillaries showed enhancement in the Treatment
Group with significant difference (p=0.006, p<0.05). Meanwhile, acinar cell
numbers analysed by means of ANOVA showed enhancement, but it was not
significant (p=0.136, p<0.05). TGF-β showed enhancement with
significant difference (p=0.008, p<0.05) as confirmed by a Kruskal Wallis
test.
Fig. 1: The morphology of
HDPSCs (yellow arrow). A) HDPSCs first isolation. B) HDPSCs first passage did
not have a fibroblast-like appearance. C) HDPSCs second passage showed
fibroblast-like appearance. D) HDPSCs third passage showed more fibroblast-like
structures when observed through a Nikon TMS Inverted Microscope (US) 100x magnification.
Fig. 2: HDPSCs expressed
positive MSCs marker CD73 (+), CD90 (+), CD105 (+), while they did not express
HSCs marker CD45 (-) (yellow arrow) as proven through ICC examination with FITC
using a fluorescence Olympus FSX100TM microscope at 100x magnification (Center
Valley, PA).
Fig. 3: Histological comparison
of the positive control and treatment groups at 400x magnification. Acinar
Cells and Capillary (Yellow Arrow) in the positive Control Group on Day 7 (A.),
in the positive Control Group on Day 14 (B.), in the Experimental Group on Day
7 (C.) and in the Experimental Group on Day 14 (D.). Acinar cells and
capillaries were analysed with HPA examination using HE staining at 1000x
magnification (Nikon H600L light microscope and a DS Fi2 digital camera with
300 megapixels and Nikon Image System image processor software).
Fig. 4: The Mean ± Standard
Deviation (SD) of acinar cells in each group. The highest number of acinar
cells were found in the T7 group, while the lowest was found in the C+14 group.
Fig. 5: The Mean ± Standard
Deviation (SD) of capillaries in each group. The highest number of capillaries
was found in the T14 group, while the lowest was found in the C+7 group.
Fig. 6: The Mean ± Standard
Deviation (SD) of Serum TGF-β in each group. The highest level of Serum
TGF-β was found in the T14 group, while the lowest was found in C+7 group.
Table 1. Multiple Comparisons
of Tukey HSD test results of acinar cells and capillaries between groups.
|
Variable |
Group |
C+ 7 |
C+ 14 |
T 7 |
T 14 |
|
Acinar Cells |
C+ 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
C+ 14 |
0.968 |
|
|
|
|
|
T 7 |
0.346 |
0.168 |
|
|
|
|
P+14 |
0.977 |
1.000 |
0.183 |
|
|
|
Capillaries |
C+ 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
C+ 14 |
0.714 |
|
|
|
|
|
T 7 |
0.072 |
0.428 |
|
|
|
|
T 14 |
0.006* |
0.059 |
0.656 |
|
*information: significant at
p< 0.05.
Table 2. Multiple Comparisons
of Bonferroni test results TGF-β between groups.
|
Variable |
Group |
C+ 7 |
C+ 14 |
T 7 |
T 14 |
|
TGF β |
C+ 7 |
|
|
|
|
|
C+ 14 |
0.003* |
|
|
|
|
|
T 7 |
1.000 |
0.006* |
|
|
|
|
T 14 |
0.002* |
0.483 |
0.003* |
|
*information: significant at
p< 0.05.
Stem cells are unspecialized
cells that can be differentiated into any type of cell in the body,
by two important characteristics.28 First, they are unspecialized
cells capable of renewing themselves through cell division, sometimes after
long period of inactivity, second, under certain physiologic or experimental
conditions they can be induced to become tissue or organ specific cells with
special functions.29 Healing process
can be observed optimally on day 7 and 14. On those day, the number of
capillaries reaching the peak and gradually decrease. HDPSC expressed
positive MSCs markers CD73 (+), CD90 (+), CD105 (+), while it did not express
HDPSCs marker CD45 (-). CD73 is expressed in wide variety of cell types including
endothelial cells, lymphocytes, and fibroblasts. CD90 expression has been
identified in endothelial cells (both vascular and lymphatic), hematopoietic
stem cells, lymphocytes, and fibroblasts. CD105 is highly expressed in vascular
endothelial cells.27 HDPSCs show great promise for regenerative medicine, give an
idea about the growth and development of an organism throughout the whole life
cycle.30,31 It can regenerate acinar cells in the submandibular gland
by increasing their numbers, as well as those of capillaries and the amount of
TGF-β
serum. No
significant difference existed between acinar cell numbers in the positive
control group and the treatment group. Rather, there was considerable
coincidence between the groups in this regard. Cell regeneration did not achieve the complete phase of cell formation
on either day 7 or day 14. Therefore, it did not show a significant increase
when observed with the HE stained microscope. However, if the observation
performed by means of ki-67 immunohistochemistry was
evaluated, it showed cell proliferation in the form of nucleus division between
day 3 and day 5.32The process of cell formation in salivary gland
is called branching morphogenesis which consists of cell proliferation, gap
formation, differentiation, cell migration, apoptosis, and reciprocal
interactions between epithelial, mesenchymal, neuronal, and endothelial cells.
The formation of cells can be observed about day 18 to 20 because there has
been proliferation in the terminal branches. Whereas in this research,
proliferation has not yet reached the terminal branch so that the number of new
acinar cells is not maximal.33
Branching morphogenesis is
interaction of mesenchymal epithelium and regulated by extracellular matrix and
growth factor. Extracellular matrix consists of collagen, laminin,
proteoglycans, fibronectin which is important for salivary morphogenesis.
Growth factors play a role for organogenesis of salivary glands and are
synthesized by the ductus. The formation of acinar cells includes stalk
elongation, cleft formation, and dichotomization. Stalk elongation is an
extension of the stem by elongation of the mesenchymal zone, then a gap at the
end of the stem is formed called the cleft formation. The gap is divided into
two clear parts called dichotomization. On day 13, there is a synthesis of
laminin which is important for gland morphogenesis. On day 15 a gland lumen is formed
and day 18 formed terminal differentiation of acinar cells. Cell proliferation
in submandibular glands is mainly localized at the end of peripheral branches,
which shows progenitor cell proliferation.34-36Normally, the damage
of salivary gland can be regenerated through the autologous division mechanism.
However, in progressive disease conditions such as DM, autologous division
cannot compensate the damage and have impact on tissue function. Therefore,
regeneration of additional progenitor cells is needed. In the body, there are
endogenous mesenchymal stem cells found in the interstitial zone near the
intercalary duct. In DM conditions, the volume of the ductus is reduced and
replaced by fibrous and adipose tissue so that the ability of cell proliferation
by endogenous stem cells is disrupted.35
There was a significant
difference between groups with regards to capillaries. The injection of HDPSCs
can regenerate salivary gland cells by increasing the number of capillaries.
HDPSCs therapy can enhance salivary gland function by trans-differentiation
into endothelial cells (ECs) to replace the damaged tissue and promote
angiogenesis. This release soluble autocrine/paracrine factors, thereby
activating endogenous adult cells involved in cell renewal/protection and
neovascularization and stimulating endogenous resident endothelial cell (ECs)
proliferation and differentiation by soluble paracrine factors. HDPSC secreted
various growth factors such as VEGF which can induce the endothelial differentiation of MSCs and has
been shown to regulate ECs migration and differentiation and promote recruitment
of ECs for angiogenesis and endothelialisation in injured
tissue.14
Angiogenesis increased on day
3, with both Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-2 (VEGFR-2) and VEGF receptor
expression rising. Furthermore, between day 5 and day 7 VEGF and VEGFR-2
reached a simultaneous peak of expression. After day 7, the lowest value for
the expression of VEGFR-2 occurred together with descending concentration of
systemic VEGF. Thereafter, on days 10 through 14, the level of expression of
VEGFR-2 increased.37-38 The number of capillaries on days 7 and 14
increased which meant that the process of angiogenesis could be stimulated by
HDPSC injection. TGF -
β experienced a slight increase in this research. Certain studies
conducted by Maring et al., and Massague have shown that
injury-activated TGFβ members control the migration of HDPSCs.39,40
HDPSCs are recruited to the injury site by homing mainly through the vascular
network. TGF-β can recruit vascular cells and promote the function of
endothelial cells and neovascularization.41 Members of the
TGF–ß subfamily regulate a variety of cellular
functions, such as cell fate, growth, proliferation, apoptosis,
differentiation, polarity, movement, invasion, and
adhesion. Normally expressed TGF-ß plays
critical roles in numerous biological behaviours such as inflammation
and immune response, embryonic development, wound
healing, extracellular matrix (ECM) formation and remodelling and epithelial–mesenchymal
transition.36,42 Moreover, TGF-ß
also modulates the expressions and/or activities of several
biochemical cues that are important for acinar cell regeneration, thus
indirectly affecting the regenerative
process.42,43 HDPSCs can regenerate submandibular
gland defects in Diabetic Wistar rats by stimulating angiogenesis, acinar
cells number and TGF–β serum.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The research was funded by the
Penelitian Dasar Unggulan Perguruan Tinggi (PDUPT) of the Ministry of Research,
Technology and Higher Education of the Republic of Indonesia (Kemenristekdikti
RI) (letter of appointment grant number 893/UN3/ 2018). The authors would like
to thank the Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Faculty of
Veterinary Medicine, Stem Cell Research and Development Centre, Universitas
Airlangga for its support of the research reported here.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
REFERENCES:
1. Nwauche KT, Monago Comfort C, Frank I. Management of Diabetes Mellitus
with Combined Therapy of Reducdyn and Metformin in Streptozotocin-induced
Diabetic Rats. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2014; 7(1): 39-43.
2. International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes
Atlas eight edition. Available from: URL: http://www.diabetesatlas.org,
2017.
3. Basha SKH, Subramanian S. Antidyslipidemic Property of Annona Squamosa
Leaves Extract Studied in Streptozotocin-Induced Experimental Diabetes in Rats.
Asian J. Research Chem. 2012; 5(2): 234-238.
4. Shrivastava SR, Shrivastava PS,
Ramasamy J. Role of self-care in management of diabetes mellitus. J Diabet and
Metab Dis. 2013; 12: 14.
5. Ranadheer CP, Praveen D, Vijey AMA. Prospective Study on Incidence of
Dyslipidemia in Diabetes Mellitus. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2017;
10(2):431-433.
6. Kumari MS, Babu MK, Sulthana R, Srinivas M, Prasanthi C. Diabetes Mellitus:
Present status and Drug Therapy Updates. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2014;
7(1):84-94.
7. Gupta A, Chaturvedi P, Shrivastava S. K., Dubey P.K. Glitazones for the
Treatment of Diabetes Type-2. Asian J. Research Chem. 2012; 5(2): 164-170.
8. Salvayre NS, Pamplona A, Otin P.
Hyperglycemia and Glycation in Diabetic Complications. Antioxid Redox Signal.
2009; 3071-3109.
9. Pintor RM, Casanas Elizabeth,
Serrano JG, Serrano J, Ramirez L, Arriba L, Hernandez G. Review Article
Xerostomia, Hyposalivation, and Salivary Flow in Diabetes Patients. Journal of
Diabetes Research. 2012; 1-2.
10. Randhika T, Ranganathan K. Original
Research: Salivary Output in Type 2 Diabetic Patients. Oral Maxillofacial
Pathology Journal. 2014; 1-2.
11. Agarwal
R, Lakshmi T. Salivary Enzymes as Biomarkers for Periodontitis – An Update.
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2014; 7(1):98-100.
12. Fatimah RN. Diabetes Mellitus Type
2. Faculty of Medicine Lampung University. 2015; 2-3.
13. Soeharno H. The Effect of Glycemic
Control on Periodontal Disease in Diabetic Patient. International Dental
Journal. 2013; 1-2.
14. Gusbi GAM, Mohamed S, El-Hafez SA.
Submandibular Glands as an Evident of the Effects of Antioxidant on Alloxan
Induced Diabetic Rats. World Journal of Medical Sciences. 2014; 210-216.
15. Tao H, Han Z, Han ZC, Li Z: Review
Article Proangiogenic Features of Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Their Therapeutic
Applications. Stem Cells International. 2016; 1314709: 1-11.
16. Pedersen T, Blois A, Xue Y, Xing Z,
Sun Y, Wistrand A, Lorens J, Fristad I, Leknes K, Mustafa K. Stem Cell Research
and Therapy: Mesenchymal Stem Cells induce Endothelial Cell Quiescence and
Promote Capillary Formation. Norway: Biomed Central. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014;
17(5): 1-23.
17. Gao F, Chiu SM, Motan DA.
Mesenchymal stem cell and immunomodulation: current status and future
prospects. Cell Death and Disease. 2016; 7(1): 62.
18. Miran S, Mitsiadis TA, Pagella P.
Innovative dental stem cell-based researchapproaches: the future of dentistry.
Stem Cells International. 2016; 1 (1): 1-10.
19. Nugraha AP, Narmada
IB, Ernawati DS, Dinaryanti A, Hendrianto E, Ihsan IS, Riawan W, Rantam FA.
Osteogenic potential of gingival stromal progenitor cells cultures in platelet
rich fibrin is predicted by core-binding factor subunit-α1/Sox9 expression
ratio (in vitro). F1000Research. 2018; 7(1134): 4.
20. Furman BL.
Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Models in Mice and Rats. Curr. Protoc.
Pharmacol. 2015; 70 (5): 5471-54720.
21. Knas M, Maciejzcyk
M, Daniszewska I, Klimiuk A, Matczuk J, Kolodziej U, Waszkiel D, Ladny JR,
Zendzian-Piotrowska M, Zalewska A. Oxidative Damage to the Salivary Glands of
Rats with Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetes-Temporal Study: Oxidative Stress and
Diabetic Salivary Glands. Journal of Diabetes Research. 2016; 3: 1-13.
22. Mahmoud EF, Mahmoud
MF: Effect of Pomegranate Peel Extract on Submandibular Salivary Glands of
Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetes in Rats: Histological, Immunohistochemical and
Ultrastructural Study. Journal of Advances in Biology and Biotechnology. 2017;
13 (3): 1-15.
23. Jang JH, Lee HW,
Shin HW, Kang MK, Park SH, Kim E. In vitro characterization of human dental
pulp stem cells isolated by three different methods. Restorative Dentistry and
Endodontics. 2016; 41 (4): 283-95.
24. Luisi SB, Filho
MSA, Pranke P. Isolation, immunophenotypic characterization and pluripotency of
dental pulp stem cells. Dent Oral Craniofac Res. 2017; 3(5):1-3.
25. Rantam FA, Nugraha AP, Narmada IB,
Ernawati DS, Widodo ADW, Lestari P,
Dinaryanti A, Hendrianto E, Ihsan IS, Susilowati
H, Ertanti N, Karsari D. Gingival
Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Wistar Rat’s Gingiva (Rattus Novergicus) –
Isolation and Characterization (In Vitro Study). J Int Med Res. 2018; 11(2):
694-699.
26. IBL International GMBH. TGF-β 1
ELISA Instructions for use. Hamburg Germany. 2017; 1-11.
27. Emanuele C, Gordon P, Guy C.
Regeneration of Acinar Cells following ligation of rat submandibular gland
retraces the embryonic-perinatal pathway of cytodifferentiation. International
Society of Differentiation. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2010; 120 -130.
28. Balaji
S. Umbilical cord blood as a source of stem cells. Research J. Pharm. and Tech.
2015; 8(8): 1093-1095.
29. Sasikala
K. Education to Nursing Students on Collection, Preservation and Utilization of
Cord Blood Stem Cells. Asian J. Nur. Edu. and Research. 2011; 1(4):113-116.
30. Selvi
ST. Stem Cell Therapy. Int. J. Adv. Nur. Management. 2017; 5(4): 361-364.
31. Patyar
DS. Role of Stem Cells in treatment of different Diseases. Research J. Pharm.
and Tech 2018; 11(8): 3667-3678.
32. Dauren S, Ahmet D, Kemal K, Mehmet
T, Osman A. Local and systemic angiogenic and antiangiogenic response in rats
after 70% hepatectomy.. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2017; 10(3): 2939-2949.
33. Sakai
T. Development and Regeneration of Salivary Gland Toward for Clinical
Application. Oral Science International Elseiver. 2016; 13(1): 7-14
34. Li Shiying, Gu
Xiasong, Yi Sheng. The Regulatory Effects of Transforming Growth Factor-β
on Nerve Regeneration.Cell Transplantation. 2017; 26(3): 381-394
35. Park MS, Kim YH,
Jung Y, Kim SH, Park JC, Yoon DS, Kim SH, Park JC, Yoon DS, Kim SH, Lee JW. In
situ recruitment of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells using
chemokines for articular cartilage regeneration. Cell Transplant. 2015; 24(6):
1067
36. Michalopuolos GK. Liver regeneration
after partial hepatectomy: critical analysis of mechanistic dilemmas. Am J
Pathol. 2010; 176: 2-13.
37. Taniguchi E, Sakisaka S, Matsuo K,
Tanikawa K, Sata M. Expression and Role of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
in liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in rats. J Histochem Cytochem.
2001; 49: 121-130.
38. Laird DI, Von Andrian UH, Wagers AJ.
Stem cell trafficking in tissue development, growth, and disease. Cell.
2008; 132: 612.
39. Maring JA, van Meeteren LA, Goumans
MJ, Ten DP. Interrogating TGF-beta function and regulation in endothelial
cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2016; 1344: 193.
40. Massague J.
TGF-beta signaling in context. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol.
2012; 13 (10): 616-646.
41. Nakao A,
Afrakhte M, Moren A, Nakayama T, Christian JL, Heuchel R, Itoh S, Kawabata M,
Heldin NE, Heldin CH, Dijke P. Identification of Smad7, a TGF-ß
inducible antagonist of TGF-beta signaling. Nature. 1997; 389 (6651): 631-636.
42. Shiying L, Xiasong G, Sheng Y. The Regulatory Effects of
Transforming Growth Factor-β on Nerve Regeneration. Cell Transplantation. 2017; 26: 381-394.
43. Ching-Shwun L, Zhong-Cheng X, Tom FL. Commonly Used
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Markers and Tracking Labels: Limitations and Challenges.
HHS Public Access. 2013; 28 (9): 1109–1116
Received on 30.01.2019
Modified on 18.02.2019
Accepted on 20.03.2019
© RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech.
2019; 12(4):1573-1579.
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00261.0